top of page
Search
CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 4
6,111
“ANG MING LEE NOT TO BE DISTINGUISHED! PURCHASER’S 36-MONTH STATUTORY CLAIM FOR LAD VALID” SAYS COA
Court of Appeal in Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd v Lam Su See [Civil Appeals No.: W-02(IM)(NCvC)-624-03/2021 & W-02(IM)(NCvC)-625-03/2021]
9,724
ANG MING LEE AND PJD REGENCY PREVAILS! – ZOOMING INTO THE DECISION OF CHIN YONGQIN
On 06.06.2021, the High Court vide a Judgment delivered by Ahmad Murad Abdul Aziz JC in Chin Yongqin v Prosper Plus Industry Sdn Bhd [2021]
2,344
NO RESTRAINTS ON HOMEBUYERS’ RIGHTFUL CLAIM FOR LAD!
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 1
13,680
IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES OF HDA AND NON-HDA PROPERTIES
In Malaysia, residential properties are sold under two types of contracts.
8,746
THE FEDERAL COURT SAYS THE CALCULATION FOR LAD BEGINS FROM BOOKING FEE DATE!
Vide the grounds of judgment of PJD Regency Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor and other appeals, the Federal Court
17,633
STARTING DATE FOR CALCULATION OF LIQUIDATED ASCERTAINED DAMAGES
The Court of Appeal decision of Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Ors [2020] 1 LNS 1090 (“Sri Damansara”) faced two
2,323
bottom of page