COMPARISON OF OBATA AND FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS POST ANG MING LEE
The apex court, previously led by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun, affirmed that a Statutory SPA under the HDA 1966, being a social contract.
top of page
Search
PURCHASERS MUST BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD UNDER THE COVID ACT
Purchasers must be given the right to be heard, which ensures the fairness of proceedings under the COVID Act.
13,710
HOMEBUYERS CAN CHALLENGE THE EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT) GRANTED UNDER THE COVID-19 Act
Recent concerns have arisen over Extension of Time (EOT) granted under Malaysia's COVID-19 Act 2020, highlighting issues with the Director-G
10,907
13 HOMEBUYERS WIN RM610K IN LAD CLAIM AGAINST DEVELOPER
The SPAs were modified by the Developer, extending the delivery of vacant possession from the standard 36 months.
11,852
92 HOMEBUYERS SUCCEEDED IN RM3.6 MILLION LAD CLAIM AGAINST DEVELOPER
In the case of Ng Sook Foon v Marimo Land Sdn Bhd [2022] MLJU 2061 ("Marimo Land")
30,217
SCHEDULE H PROJECTS SHALL BE DELIVERED WITHIN 36 MONTHS
Schedule H is a statutory agreement wherein developer receives the payment according to stages of completion.
25,299
SUCCESSFUL MALAYSIA LIQUIDATED ASCERTAINED DAMAGES (LAD) CASES IN FAVOUR OF HOMEBUYERS
Cases wherein purchasers were successful in their pursuit of Liquidated Ascertained Damages LAD for late delivery of vacant possession
34,021
![CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_1168,h_876,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.jpg)
CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 4
6,111
“ANG MING LEE NOT TO BE DISTINGUISHED! PURCHASER’S 36-MONTH STATUTORY CLAIM FOR LAD VALID” SAYS COA
Court of Appeal in Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd v Lam Su See [Civil Appeals No.: W-02(IM)(NCvC)-624-03/2021 & W-02(IM)(NCvC)-625-03/2021]
9,724
ANG MING LEE AND PJD REGENCY PREVAILS! – ZOOMING INTO THE DECISION OF CHIN YONGQIN
On 06.06.2021, the High Court vide a Judgment delivered by Ahmad Murad Abdul Aziz JC in Chin Yongqin v Prosper Plus Industry Sdn Bhd [2021]
2,338
NO RESTRAINTS ON HOMEBUYERS’ RIGHTFUL CLAIM FOR LAD!
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 1
13,674
IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES OF HDA AND NON-HDA PROPERTIES
In Malaysia, residential properties are sold under two types of contracts.
8,643
THE FEDERAL COURT SAYS THE CALCULATION FOR LAD BEGINS FROM BOOKING FEE DATE!
Vide the grounds of judgment of PJD Regency Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor and other appeals, the Federal Court
17,619
STARTING DATE FOR CALCULATION OF LIQUIDATED ASCERTAINED DAMAGES
The Court of Appeal decision of Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Ors [2020] 1 LNS 1090 (“Sri Damansara”) faced two
2,319
bottom of page